Here we go again, the same old tired press whores pushing the governments preferred narrative and of course we have Libby Coker calling the distributers of the pamphlet “irresponsible.” Well Libby anyone could call the Geelong Advertiser and you along with your government “irresponsible” in fact in the absence of any actual evidence to back up the narrative, the lockdown, wearing of masks, social distancing, travel restrictions, curfews, the faulty PCR tests, the statistical interference with covid numbers of cases and deaths and of the course the vax we should all have, not only makes you people irresponsible, but criminally negligent, at least until the evidence is presented, which will never happen because you are incapable of presenting evidence you have neither seen and that doesn’t actually exist.
While we might be prudent to wait on Daniel Andrews to provide a clearer perspective on what is dangerous behaviour, its relatively easy to see that its actually you who are criminally irresponsible and you and your government have blood on your hands because you and the so called “representatives” in Geelong have supported the continuing state of emergency without any reason whatsoever. It could be reasonably interpreted that the government is directly responsible for the over 200 cases of death which have occurred as a a direct result of vaccinations being administered along with the thousands of people undergoing negative effects. These are facts that you should be aware of and if you are then a planned genocide being underway is not an unreasonable conclusion to arrive at.
It was only for the short space of time when the supermarket ran out of toilet paper did I invest in the odd Geelong Advertiser but even then I didn’t bother to read it because they are intent on conforming opinion as opposed to informing it so I just don’t buy it anymore because basically they are full of shit and of course Libby Coker’s attitude is plain, she would rather make it all mandatory and remove people’s right to decide for themselves which is against and inconsistent with the ideals of the Nuremberg Charter.